So, Intro to Chaos has a final project rather than a final exam. Since I suggested the topic of chaos in a chemical system (an abstracted form of the BZ reaction), I've wound up as the "leader" in a group of four people. We just finished the first meeting.

My project-mates are:
* RD, an engineering undergrad, probably EE. High enthusiasm.
* P, another engineer undergrad, didn't get his specialty. Intermediate enthusiasm.
* RS, biochem grad student. Too reserved for me to determine how much the project interests him. (RS was really quiet. Is this a personal difference, a cultural one, or group dynamics?)

This time was mostly a chance to meet eachother and make sure we're all on the same page. Turns out that the professor didn't distribute all the documentation that I thought he was going to, so everyone else has two background papers to at least skim before we can start doing analyses. I also have "homework": figuring out which of the various implementations of BZ-type reactions have good color and contrast for recording, and pricing out the reagents for them. (These will typically only ship to an organization, but I have approval from Employerprof to send them to her office.)

This is a big project. The system has four real variables, and four parameters that we're supposed to vary among three states. It has the potential to turn into a combinatoric nightmare, so we're going to have to make some scope decisions. Might be able to do that next time.
Tags:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

.

Profile

403: Listen to the song of the paper cranes... (Default)
403

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags