Entry tags:
Lightbulb moment
I like working with big, messy systems with lots of variables. From where I stand now, that's the most prominent thread connecting what I've enjoyed about studying STEM fields.
It makes me wonder whether I wouldn't be better off in a field that's generally acknowledged to be difficult to handle with reductionistic methods. (Classic example being the life sciences - if you take a creature apart to try to figure out how it works, it very quickly stops working.)
It makes me wonder whether I wouldn't be better off in a field that's generally acknowledged to be difficult to handle with reductionistic methods. (Classic example being the life sciences - if you take a creature apart to try to figure out how it works, it very quickly stops working.)
no subject
>very quickly stops working.)
Sort of the point of so doing, no?
Sounds like you want to be in either programming or a neurology-related field -- which latter is a subset of the former if you think about it right. *Studying* brains is by definition recursive -- or if it's not, please let me know what you're thinking that with.
best,
Joel
(no subject)